Icon class icon_class far fa-sticky-note icon_class_computed far fa-sticky-note Note kind MODELLING REQUIREMENT Policy level STRICT Specification keywords SysML-1.6 SysML-1.7 SysMLv2 Keywords Webel Parsing Analysis WPA:«snippet» parsing analysis container Systems Modeling Language Relates to Related notes [REQUIREMENT]{STRICT} Webel Parsing Analysis: A Parsing Analysis Container MUST NOT be able to own the Elements it elicits Related notes (backlinks) [REQUIREMENT]{STRICT} Webel Parsing Analysis: A Parsing Analysis Container MAY collect any other Element type as a member EXCEPT for another Parsing Analysis Container [REQUIREMENT]{STRICT} Webel Parsing Analysis: A Parsing Analysis Container MAY own other child Parsing Analysis Containers [DISPLAY, REQUIREMENT]{STRICT} Webel Parsing Analysis: The symbol for a Parsing Analysis Container MUST be able to indicate the unique domain source document from which its analysed text extract was quoted. [DISPLAY, REQUIREMENT]{STRICT} Webel Parsing Analysis: The symbol for a Parsing Analysis Container MUST be able to OPTIONALLY display a list of names of elicited model elements (a.k.a. members) [TIP]{INFORMATIVE} Webel Parsing Analysis: The absolute basics of the process (SysMLv1.x form) [DISPLAY, REQUIREMENT]{STRICT} Webel Parsing Analysis: It SHOULD be possible to relate one Parsing Analysis Container to another and stereotype that relationship as an RDF/OWL-like semantic triple [DISPLAY, REQUIREMENT]{STRICT} Webel Parsing Analysis: It MUST be possible to collect elicited members of a Parsing Analysis Container graphically in diagrams using relationship-like path drawing (not just via a specification dialog or other indirect modelling means) [DISPLAY, REQUIREMENT]{STRICT} Webel Parsing Analysis: The symbol for the relationship between a Parsing Analysis Container and elicited model elements SHOULD be a dashed line (like the anchor/handle line used with a UML Comment) [DISPLAY, REQUIREMENT]{STRICT} Webel Parsing Analysis: The symbol for a Parsing Analysis Container MUST be text-friendly and evocative of quoting a domain source text extract [MODELLING]{INFORMATIVE} SysMLv2: On the v2 Comment extension of the v2 AnnotatingElement as a candidate Parsing Analysis Container [QUESTION]{INFORMATIVE} SysMLv1.x: Q: Why can't a Package with PackageImports be used as a Parsing Analysis text container? Why is the SysML1.6 ElementGroup (extended and customised as the Webel «snippet») far better suited for text-driven model element elicitation? Related snippets (extracts) Visit also The Webel Parsing Analysis recipe for SysML Visit also (backlinks) Flags