Webel Parsing Analysis: Where too many dashed line "anchors" from Snippets to elicited members lead to clutter they may be selectively omitted from a Parsing Analysis Diagram (PAD) once each member has been collected.

Icon class
icon_class
far fa-sticky-note
icon_class_computed
far fa-sticky-note
Note kind
MODELLING
NAMING
POLICY
Policy level
RECOMMENDED
Specification keywords
SysML-1.6
SysML-1.7
UML keywords
Comment
Comment::annotatedElement
MD:anchor
Keywords
It's not a good idea to remove all of the "anchor" dashed lines, just some. Consider just trying also:
Webel Parsing Analysis: If the dashed-line "anchors" from your «snippet» ElementGroup symbols to elicited elements make a «pa» Parsing Analysis Diagram (PAD) too hard to read, try making them light grey using symbol properties.
And remember always that:
Webel Parsing Analysis «pa» diagrams are NOT intended as final presentation diagrams! They serve merely to traceably elicit model elements, which may then be shown in other (typically much tidier) presentation diagrams elsewhere.
Relates to
PAD for eliciting the letters of an English-language pangram
Related notes
[TOOL]{INFORMATIVE} In MagicDraw/Cameo the dashed line symbol from a UML Comment or SysMLv1.x ElementGroup to an annotatedElement is called an 'anchor'.
[TIP]{EDITORIAL} In Webel Parsing Analysis every Package, Model, or Diagram used to perform Parsing Analysis MUST have the stereotype keyword «pa» applied, and MUST live under a top-level Model or Package 'source' separate from the rest of the project model.
[POLICY, STYLE]{STRICT} Webel Parsing Analysis «pa» diagrams are NOT intended as final presentation diagrams! They serve merely to traceably elicit model elements, which may then be shown in other (typically much tidier) presentation diagrams elsewhere.
[MODELLING, POLICY, TOOL]{STRICT} Webel Parsing Analysis: As StateMachine Diagrams are always owned by an element that is not eventually under the Source Input Zone they should not be used as «pa» diagrams. Elicit States instead via the /member section of the specification dialog.
[POLICY]{STRICT} Webel Parsing Analysis: Create a top-level 'source' or '0-source' Package/Model SEPARATE from your project model. All source «document» elements and «snippet» extracts and «pa» diagrams MUST be ultimately owned by that top-level Package/Model as ancestor!
[DISPLAY, STYLE, TIP]{SUGGESTED} Webel Parsing Analysis: If the dashed-line "anchors" from your «snippet» ElementGroup symbols to elicited elements make a «pa» Parsing Analysis Diagram (PAD) too hard to read, try making them light grey using symbol properties.
[POLICY, STYLE]{STRICT} Webel «pa» Parsing Analysis Diagrams (PADs) are "scratchpads" used to elicit model elements traceably from text Snippets (extracts from source Documents). While BDDs are a good initial choice, most types of SysML diagram can be used as a «pa» diagram.
Related notes (backlinks)
Related snippets (extracts)
Visit also
Visit also (backlinks)