functional programming

Mathematica: Webel ADT pseudo classes: 'Q: Do I have to use these EX$Val scalar "atom" thingies and the EX$Row, EX$RowList, and EX$RowMap? Can't I just use Wolfram Language Lists and Associations?' A: Of course you can also use the basic Wolfram Language!

Mathematica: Webel ADT pseudo classes: An EX$Val has concise methods for testing the type of its wrapped '$$' value: isR, isI, isB, isQ, isS. These may be used in ADT "constructor" type tests.

Mathematica: Webel ADT pseudo classes: The validity of the type of a wrapped '$$' value of an EX$Val may be checked in ADT "constructors" which have type checking utility support. This strategy has been chosen over sub-types of EX$Val.

Mathematica: Webel ADT pseudo classes: There does not seem to be a way to register ::usage specific to a Webel ADT-Method (TagSetDelayed UpValue). The Webel libraries offer method documentation support via the HelpO` class/method registry.

Mathematica: Webel ADT pseudo classes: Webel ADT-Methods support Wolfram Language Options[] as TagSetDelayed UpValues (but there are some pros and cons). Webel ADT-Methods work with the Webel HelpO` class/method registry, including rich help on options.

Mathematica: Webel ADT pseudo classes: «adt:ref» applied to a property indicates that it is resolved by ID through the ADT store using adt$fetch[id]. Use adt$store[adt] for very large ADTs and for cleaner ADT views and easier Notebook development.

Mathematica: Webel ADT pseudo classes: POLICY: Where an ADT-Method uses UUID-driven Once[] caching the trigger argument is a String '$uuid' which MUST have a default None and MUST be the first argument that has a default.

Mathematica: Webel ADT pseudo classes: The SysMLv1 models are supported by custom stereotypes with icons. Some of these indicate OO-similar use of ADT-Methods and departures from formal Abstract Data Type (ADT) definitions.

Mathematica: Webel ADT pseudo classes: POLICY: The ADT-Methods of an ADT-Class are created as TagSetDelayed UpValues using the 'signature' of the ADT-Class and its defining 'pattern' as 1st argument

Mathematica: Webel ADT pseudo classes: CONVENTION: PROVISIONAL: The infix operator for calling ADT-Methods on ADT "objects" is the CircleDot (⊙ in Notebooks). ISSUE: \[CircleDot] is NOT GOOD FOR USE IN IDEs!

Mathematica: Webel ADT pseudo classes: POLICY/DEFINITION: Every "hard coded" definer or defining client of a definer has a corresponding ADT ArchetypeClass. Example ("hard coded"): The definer 'my$def$MY$SmartList' has ArchetypeClass 'MY$SmartList'.

Mathematica: Webel ADT pseudo classes: TIP: Prefer the Decorator Pattern over multiple inheritance of ADT-Method UpValues! (But not because "inheritance is evil" per se, it isn't.) The base ADT libraries make heavy (and very useful) use in inheritance.

Mathematica: Webel ADT pseudo classes: A tricky POLICY & CONVENTION: Client packages MUST access the special "wrapped" primary '$$' via $ContextAliases! The recommended alias is "A`" (which stands of course for ADT).

Mathematica: Webel ADT pseudo classes: POLICY: Multiple inheritance is supported via ONE (only) ADT-Class and one or more ADT-MemberInterfaces (which have no ADT-Method UpValues)

Mathematica: Webel ADT pseudo classes: POLICY: Definer functions MUST return the self-declared or injected 'pattern' that determines the unique "ADT-signature" of the defined ADT class.

Mathematica: Webel ADT pseudo classes: ADTs that define membership of ADT-classes in a domain package have ADT-signature MemberInterface[$$:None] and MUST NOT populate ADT-method UpValues in their definers.

Mathematica: Webel ADT pseudo classes: NAMING CONVENTION: An UpValue that can be invoked on an ADT accepting its unique 'signature' pattern as (at least) 1st argument is called an 'ADT-Method'. They are NOT methods in the general object-oriented sense!

Mathematica: Webel ADT pseudo classes: There is an 'ADT' universal base that has no supers. It "blesses" every other sub-class ADT by populating it with some common ADT-Method UpValues against a signature pattern via the 'adt$def$All[]' definer function.

Mathematica: Webel ADT pseudo classes: DEFINITION/CONVENTION: Functions that populate ADTs with reusable ADT-method UpValues are called 'definers' and include '$def' in the name after a Package scope indicator: Example: adt$def$ADT, my$def$MY$CleverList

Mathematica: Webel ADT pseudo classes: POLICY: Every named concrete Abstract Data Type (ADT) has a ONE unique "signature" (which is the pattern passed to the "definer" functions). To vary a signature, define another unique ADT name.

Mathematica: Webel ADT pseudo classes: POLICY: The Abstract Data Types (ADTs) are stateless functional (although inheritance and overrides are supported), with no caching by default (although there is nice optional caching using CreateUUID[] and Once[]).

Mathematica: Webel ADT: The term 'Abstract Data Types (ADT)' is used informally (the Webel ADTs do not always adhere to strict definitions of ADTs). Please just think of it here as meaning a strong type or stateless "pseudo class".

Mathematica: Webel: You get compelling incremental value out of Mathematica even if you don't yet command all of the syntax and massive powers of the Wolfram Language!

Webel: SysML4Mathematica: SysML Activities and SysML Activity Diagrams CAN represent some functional programming paradigms (sort of). You can type Parameters by encapsulations of functions and pass them to/from InputPins/OutputPins of Actions.

The Webel Recipe for SysML-friendly Wolfram Language coding in Mathematica

Keywords

Keywords

As part of a long term project developed, initially during work for a client, Webel IT Australia in partnership with GreenSoft Pty Ltd is developing a very complex Mathematica application with substantial SysML modelling support.

Mathematica: 'Through' is your more functional friend.

TIP: Mathematica: Use of For is often a hint that Map, Table, Scan, or something else more functional could be used. But don't stress over it!

"Everything now uses functional, nobody uses object-oriented anymore ... " WRONG: Grow up! Dr Darren (Webel IT)

Webel: Mathematica is functional programming on steroids (and has nearly everything else, except for decent in-built OO support, although you can make some progress with Abstract Data Types and even some inheritance).

Webel: Programmers who can count higher than one (1) know that you don't have to choose exclusively between object-orientation (and classes) and functional programming. You can have your cake and eat it. It's not XOR!

Subscribe to functional programming

Site looks mangled? Get help here

We are Australia's Systems Modeling Language (SysML^®) and Model-Based Systems Engineering (MBSE) specialists!

Catch our SysML/MBSE course Early Bird Deal 30% off all courses fully booked by 30th June 2025!

SysMLv1 slide set PDFs now available for purchase!

Home of the Webel Parsing Analysis recipe for Model-Based Systems Engineering with SysML^®

Visit our Client showcase